<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarii la: CPM/CPC versus CPA/CPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://afiliere.afilieri.com/2008/cpmcpc-versus-cpacps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://afiliere.afilieri.com/2008/cpmcpc-versus-cpacps/</link>
	<description>programe de afiliere online si marketing afiliat in Romania</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>De către: Versuri</title>
		<link>http://afiliere.afilieri.com/2008/cpmcpc-versus-cpacps/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Versuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.afilieri.com/?p=33#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Multumesc frumos pentru informatii, de CPA/CPS chiar nu auzisem pana acum, insa stiam acest tip de afilieri, fara a sti cum se numesc. 

Oricum tind sa cred ca la siteuri cu trafic mult, care nu sunt nisate bine, cel mai ok se potriveste CPM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multumesc frumos pentru informatii, de CPA/CPS chiar nu auzisem pana acum, insa stiam acest tip de afilieri, fara a sti cum se numesc. </p>
<p>Oricum tind sa cred ca la siteuri cu trafic mult, care nu sunt nisate bine, cel mai ok se potriveste CPM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
